Saturday, 19 February 2022

Summary Reader's Response - Draft #3

In the article “How can Southeast Asia’s clean energy transition be sped up?”, Ha (2019) wrote on experts who addressed how Southeast Asia (SEA) should implement various methods to beget green energy production. According to Ha, Moniz, who is the Chief Executive of the Energy Futures and Nuclear Threat Initiative, stated that deploying an array of "low-carbon technologies and solutions" in SEA is vital to reducing emissions. Moniz also mentioned that Singapore is inapt for the usage of solar and wind power due to having limited natural resources and space and may reap more from nuclear fusion or hydrogen power. Ha also says that implementing such methods is not cost efficient to meet the objectives of the Paris Agreement. Ha also mentioned that Wong, the Group Chief Executive of utilities company Singapore Power, believes that balancing energy consumption rates is more critical than creating a new energy source to suit our current lifestyle. Instead, Ha mentions the Ecosperity report, in which it would be more beneficial for SEA if energy conservation methods were emphasised more while accommodating growing economic needs. Ha further mentions the report stating that energy demand in SEA is set to "increase by nearly two-thirds until 2040". With this significant increase in energy consumption, I believe that the best solution to reduce Singapore's reliance on burning fossil fuels for energy is by harnessing solar energy.

Singapore is a small and resource constrained country. Therefore, Singapore imports almost all its energy needs and has limited renewable and sustainable energy options. According to the Energy Market Authority of Singapore (2022), Singapore produced 95% of its energy through the use of imported natural gas, a type of fossil fuel, in the first-half of 2021. With land scarcity and the lack of natural resources, Singapore faces additional difficulty as not all renewable energy sources are viable. For instance, commercial wind turbines operate at roughly 4.5 m/s whereas the average wind speed in Singapore is only 2 m/s (Singapore Climate Change Secretariat, 2022). Furthermore, Singapore does not have a fast-flowing river or strong tidal and wave power to produce hydroelectric power. On the other hand, harnessing solar energy is operationally and financially feasible in Singapore. It has already been implemented but inadequately, as only 2.8% of the country's energy comes from solar photovoltaic systems (PV) (Energy Market Authority, 2022).

Singapore's security can be considerably enhanced with the implementation and usage of solar energy. Singapore has faced several issues with the importation of much-needed resources in the past (Lin, 2021), and achieving self-sustainability has always been vital to the country. The Singapore Green Plan 2030 was implemented to set targets to achieve this goal. One of the country's goals is to increase solar energy deployment by five-fold by 2030. This will generate enough energy to power roughly 350 thousand households (Singapore Green Plan, 2022). Solar energy requires no import of fuels, which strengthens Singapore's energy security. Furthermore, the deployment of this renewable energy will be very efficient as the technology has already been used and tested in the nation, unlike other forms of renewable energy sources such as nuclear power.

Singapore consumes most of its energy during the day, so the utilization of solar PV will help to reduce the use of fossil fuels, especially during peak demand. This is because peak demand occurs where there is most output of solar energy (Energy Market Authority, 2020). This significantly supports lowering the use of fossil fuels, which is detrimental to the environment, during the time when these fuels are used and needed the most. Unlike the use of fossil fuels, solar PVs produce zero-emissions when operating, and is clearly an effective method to reduce carbon emissions and ensure sustainability.

Whilst solar energy is a practical approach to providing sustainable and renewable energy, there are some drawbacks that impact its feasibility. The most apparent issue with deploying this method in Singapore would be that there are space limitations. Singapore, as mentioned, has a limited amount of land. Configurations must be done in certain arrays in order for solar PVs to function well, causing extra costs and delays in installation (Lai, 2021). With solar PVs high installation costs and long payback period, it begs the question of whether it is worth the long-term investment for the country. However, as Singapore aims to reduce carbon emissions and become a self-sustaining country, the benefits of using solar PVs outweigh the costs.

In conclusion, the implementation and use of solar energy is imperative to Singapore's security and impact on climate change. Although the country faces constraints that greatly impact the solution to this problem, it is necessary that Singapore reduces its use and reliance on burning fossil fuels for energy. And the most efficient method is through the use of solar PV systems.

(794 words)

References:

Energy Market Authority. (2022). Singapore Energy Statistics | Energy Transformation

Energy Market Authority. (2020). Solar Photovoltaic Systems.
https://www.ema.gov.sg/Solar_Photovoltaic_Systems.aspx
  
Lai, L. (2021, May 5). Solar Energy Pros & Cons: What You Need To Know. 
iSwitch. https://iswitch.com.sg/solar-energy-pros-cons/#:%7E:text=Disadvantage%20%231%3A%20High%20Initial%20Investment%20%26%20Payback%20Period&text=While%20solar%20panel%20prices%20are,you%20hit%20the%20payback%20period. 

Letcher, T. M. (2018). Why Solar Energy?. In A Comprehensive Guide to Solar Energy 
Systems (pp. 3-16). Academic Press. 

Lin, Suling. (2021, January 8). Commentary: Beyond scarcity and security, does 
Singapore need a new water narrative? https://www.channelnewsasia.com/commentary/singapore-water-security-malaysia-conservation-new-narrative-896776  

Singapore Climate Change Secretariat. (2022). Singapore’s Approach To Alternative 
Energyhttps://www.nccs.gov.sg/singapores-climate-action/singapore-approach-to-alternative-energy/#:%7E:text=As%20a%20small%2C%20resource%2Dconstrained,has%20limited%20renewable%20energy%20options%3A&text=Hydroelectric%20power%20cannot%20be%20harnessed,not%20have%20geothermal%20energy%20sources.  

Singapore Green Plan. 
(2022). Singapore Green Plan 2030 Key Targets. SG Green 
Plan. https://www.greenplan.gov.sg/key-focus-areas/key-targets#city-in-nature

Wednesday, 16 February 2022

Summary Reader's Response - Draft #2

In the article “How can Southeast Asia’s clean energy transition be sped up?”, Ha (2019) wrote on experts who addressed how Southeast Asia (SEA) should implement various methods to beget green energy production. According to Ha, Moniz, who is the Chief Executive of the Energy Futures and Nuclear Threat Initiative, stated that deploying an array of "low-carbon technologies and solutions" in SEA is vital to reducing emissions. Moniz also mentioned that Singapore is inapt for the usage of solar and wind power due to having limited natural resources and space and may reap more from nuclear fusion or hydrogen power. Ha also says that implementing such methods is not cost efficient to meet the objective of the Paris Agreement. Ha also mentioned that Wong, the Group Chief Executive of utilities company Singapore Power, believes that  balancing energy consumption rates are more critical than creating a new energy source to suit our current lifestyle. Instead, Ha mentions the Ecosperity report, in which it would be more beneficial for SEA if energy conservation methods were emphasised more while accommodating growing economic needs. Ha further mentions the report stating that energy demand in SEA is set to "increase by nearly two-thirds until 2040". With this significant increase in energy consumption, I believe that the best solution to reduce Singapore's reliance on burning fossil fuels for energy, is by harnessing solar energy.

Singapore is a small and resource constrained country. Therefore, Singapore imports almost all its energy needs and has limited renewable and sustainable energy options. According to the Energy Market Authority of Singapore (EMA), Singapore produced 95% of its energy through the use of imported natural gas, which is a type of fossil fuel, in the first-half of 2021 (Energy Market Authority, 2022). With land scarcity and the lack of natural resources, Singapore faces additional difficulty as not all renewable energy sources are viable. For instance, commercial wind turbines operate at roughly 4.5 m/s whereas the average wind speed in Singapore is only 2 m/s (Singapore Climate Change Secretariat, 2022). Furthermore, Singapore does not have a fast flowing river or strong tidal and wave power to produce hydroelectric power. On the other hand, harnessing solar energy is operationally and financially feasible in Singapore. It has already been implemented but inadequately, as only 2.8% of the country's energy comes from solar photovoltaic systems (PV) (Energy Market Authority, 2022).

Singapore had faced several issues with importation of much-needed resources in the past (Lin, 2021) and achieving self-sustainability has always been vital to Singapore. The Singapore Green Plan 2030 was implemented to set out targets to achieve this goal. One of the country's goal is to increase solar energy deployment by five-fold by 2030. This will generate enough energy to power roughly 350 thousand households (Singapore Green Plan, 2022). Solar energy requires no import of fuels, which strengthens Singapore's energy security. Furthermore, the deployment of this renewable energy will be very efficient as the technology has already been used and tested in the nation, unlike other forms of renewable energy sources such as nuclear power.

Singapore consumes most of its energy during the day so the utilization of solar PV will help to reduce the use of fossil fuels especially during peak demand. This is because peak demand occurs where there is most output of solar energy (Energy Market Authority, 2020). This significantly supports in lowering the use of fossil fuels, which is detrimental to the environment, during the time when these fuels are used and needed the most. Unlike the use of fossil fuels, solar PVs produces zero-emissions when operating, and is clearly an effective method to reduce carbon emissions and ensure sustainability.

Whilst solar energy is a practical approach in providing sustainable and renewable energy, there are some drawbacks that impact its feasibility. The most apparent issue of deploying this method in Singapore would be that there are space limitations. Singapore, as mentioned, has limited amount of land. Configurations have to be done in certain arrays in order for it to function well, causing extra costs and delays in installation (Lai, 2021). With solar PVs high installation costs and long payback period, it begs the question if it is worth the long-term investment for the country. However, as Singapore aims to reduce carbon emissions and become a more self-sustaining country, the benefits of using solar PVs outweigh the costs.

In conclusion, the implementation and use of solar energy is imperative to Singapore's security and impact on climate change. Although the country faces constraints that greatly impact the solution to this problem, it is necessary that Singapore reduces its use and reliance on burning fossil fuels for energy. And the most efficient method is through the use of solar PV systems.

(786 words)

References:

Letcher, T. M. (2018). Why Solar Energy?. In A Comprehensive Guide to Solar Energy 
Systems (pp. 3-16). Academic Press. 
 
Lai, L. (2021, May 5). Solar Energy Pros & Cons: What You Need To Know. 

Lin, Suling. (2021, January 8). Commentary: Beyond scarcity and security, does 

Singapore Green Plan. (2022). Singapore Green Plan 2030 Key Targets. SG Green 

Energy Market Authority. (2020). Solar Photovoltaic Systems. EMA. 

Energy Market Authority. (2022). Singapore Energy Statistics | Energy Transformation

Singapore Climate Change Secretariat. (2022). Singapore’s Approach To Alternative 

 

Thursday, 10 February 2022

Summary Reader's Response - Draft #1

In the article “How can Southeast Asia’s clean energy transition be sped up?”, Ha (2019) wrote on experts who addressed how Southeast Asia (SEA) should implement various methods to beget green energy production. According to Ha, Moniz, who is the Chief Executive of the Energy Futures and Nuclear Threat Initiative, stated that deploying an array of "low-carbon technologies and solutions" in SEA is vital to reducing emissions. Moniz also mentioned that Singapore is inapt for the usage of solar and wind power due to having limited natural resources and space and may reap more from nuclear fusion or hydrogen power. Ha also says that implementing such methods is not cost efficient to meet the objective of the Paris Agreement. Ha also mentioned that Wong, the Group Chief Executive of utilities company Singapore Power, believes that  balancing energy consumption rates are more critical than creating a new energy source to suit our current lifestyle. Instead, Ha mentions the Ecosperity report, in which it would be more beneficial for SEA if energy conservation methods were emphasised more while accommodating growing economic needs. Ha further mentions the report stating that energy demand in SEA is set to increase by nearly two-thirds until 2040. I believe with this significant increase in energy consumption, and the risk of climate change, Singapore is in urgent need of additional sustainable and renewable energy sources, primarily solar energy.

Singapore is a small and resource constrained country. Therefore, Singapore imports almost all its energy needs and has limited renewable and sustainable energy options. According to the Energy Market Authority of Singapore (EMA), in the first-half of 2021, Singapore produced 95% of its energy through the use of imported natural gas. (Energy Market Authority, 2022). With land scarcity and lack of natural resources, Singapore faces additional difficulty as not all renewable energy sources are viable. For instance, wind turbines operate at roughly 4.5 m/s whereas the average wind speed in Singapore is 2 m/s. (Singapore Climate Change Secretariat, 2022) Singapore does not have a fast flowing river or strong tidal and wave power to produce hydroelectric power. On the other hand, harnessing solar energy is operationally and financially feasible in Singapore. It has already been implemented but inadequately, as only 2.8% of the country's  energy comes from solar photovoltaic systems (PV) (Energy Market Authority, 2022).

Singapore had faced several issues with importation of much-needed resources in the past (Suling, L., 2021). Achieving self-sustainability has always been vital to Singapore. The Singapore Green Plan 2030 was implemented to set out targets to achieve this goal. One of the country's goal is to increase solar energy deployment by five-fold by 2030. This will generate enough energy to power roughly 350 thousand households (Singapore Green Plan, 2022). Solar energy requires no import of fuels, which strengthens Singapore's energy security. Furthermore, the deployment of this renewable energy will be very efficient as the technology has already been used and tested in the nation, unlike other forms of renewable energy sources such as nuclear power.

Singapore consumes most of its energy during the day. Using solar PV can help to reduce peak demand as this occurs where there is the most output of solar energy (Energy Market Authority, 2020). This significantly supports in lowering the use of fossil fuels, which is detrimental to the environment, during the time when these fuels are used the most. Solar PVs produces zero-emissions when operating and is clearly an effective method to reducing carbon emissions and ensuring sustainability.

Whilst solar energy is a practical approach in providing sustainable and renewable energy, there are some drawbacks that impact its feasibility. The most apparent issue of deploying this method in Singapore would be that there are space limitations. Singapore, as mentioned, has limited amount of land. Configurations have to be done in certain arrays in order for it to function, causing extra costs and delays in installation (Lai, 2021). This adds to the other drawback of solar PVs high installation costs and long payback period which begs the question if it's worth the long-term investment for the country.

In conclusion, renewable and sustainable energy sources are imperative to Singapore's security and impact on climate change. Although the country faces constraints that greatly impact the solution to this problem, it is necessary that Singapore reduces its use and reliance on burning fossil fuels for energy. And the most efficient method is through the use of solar PV systems.

(736 words)

Read: Yumeme, Justin, Thomas

References

Letcher, T. M. (2018). Why Solar Energy?. In A Comprehensive Guide to Solar Energy 
Systems (pp. 3-16). Academic Press. 
 
Lai, L. (2021, May 5). Solar Energy Pros & Cons: What You Need To Know. 

Lin, Suling. (2021, January 8). Commentary: Beyond scarcity and security, does 

Singapore Green Plan. (2022). Singapore Green Plan 2030 Key Targets. SG Green 

Energy Market Authority. (2020). Solar Photovoltaic Systems. EMA. 

Energy Market Authority. (2022). Singapore Energy Statistics | Energy Transformation

Singapore Climate Change Secretariat. (2022). Singapore’s Approach To Alternative 

 

Sunday, 6 February 2022

Summary Draft 2 - Clean Energy Transition

In the article, Ha (2019) wrote on experts who addressed how Southeast Asia (SEA) should implement various methods to beget green energy production. According to Ha, Moniz, who is the Chief Executive of the Energy Futures and Nuclear Threat Initiative, stated that deploying an array of "low-carbon technologies and solutions" in SEA is vital to reducing emissions. Moniz also mentioned that Singapore is inapt for the usage of solar and wind power due to having limited natural resources and space and may reap more from nuclear fusion or hydrogen power. However, implementing such methods is not cost efficient to meet the objective of the Paris Agreement. On the other hand, Wong, the Group Chief Executive of utilities company Singapore Power, believes that  balancing energy consumption rates are more critical than creating a new energy source to suit our current lifestyle. Instead, according to an Ecosperity report, it would be more beneficial for SEA if energy conservation methods were emphasised more while accommodating growing economic needs. Singapore, in my opinion, is challenged by climate change and is in urgent need of additional sustainable and renewable energy sources, primarily solar energy.


Reference

Ha, T. (2019, July 19). How can Southeast Asia's Clean Energy Transition be sped up?
Eco-Business. https://www.eco-business.com/news/how-can-southeast-asias-clean-energy-transition-be-sped-up/

Read: Yumeme, Justin and Thomas

Thursday, 3 February 2022

Critical Thinking: The Soul of Effective Communication

The article, "Critical Thinking: The Soul of Effective Communication" published by Pearson TalentLens (2014), is truly what I connect with and believe strongly in. Communication is the bridge between confusion and clarity, and it starts with a thought, a feeling, and an emotion. Critical thinking is the way to systematically and rationally build on our thoughts. 

As a future leader, I understand that I must practice effective communication and critical thinking on a regular basis. To reduce ambiguity, leaders must think critically and speak clearly. Listening to oneself is paramount as I am more conscious of my own views, experiences, and biases. This allows me to think beyond the constraints of my own biases. To me, effective leaders are those who listen, empathize, and inspire. None of which is possible without strong communication skills.

On the other hand, poor communication will only increase ambiguity and is "linked to poor employee engagement and attrition" (Pearson TalentLens, 2014). Furthermore, research done by the Project Management Institute shows that 7.5 percent of a project's cost is at risk due to ineffective communication (Project Management Institute, 2013). That is US$75 million for every US$1 billion spent. Therefore, it is clear to me that a leader should always think critically and communicate effectively.

References

Pearson TalentLens. (2014, March 25). Critical Thinking: The Soul of Effective Communication. https://talentlens.in/critical-thinking-the-soul-of-effective-communication/#:~:text=Critical%20thinking%20is%20a%20tool,in%20the%20most%20optimal%20way

Project Management Institute. (2013, May). THE HIGH COST OF LOW PERFORMANCE: THE ESSENTIAL ROLE OF COMMUNICATIONS. 
https://www.pmi.org/-/media/pmi/documents/public/pdf/learning/thought-leadership/pulse/the-essential-role-of-communications.pdf

Read: Yumeme, Justin, Thomas


Critical Reflection

In my self-introductory letter I wrote in the first few weeks of this module, I mentioned that my  weakness in my communication skills is th...